New kernels

AmigaOne X1000 platform specific issues related to Linux only.
User avatar
xeno74
Posts: 10712
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2012 7:58 am
Contact:

Re: New kernels

Post by xeno74 »

Hi All,

I released the RC3 of kernel 6.17 for X1000 and e5500 machines (X5000/20, X5000/40, Mirari, and QEMU VMs) today.

Download and further information: github.com

Image

Please test the kernels.

Thanks,
Christian
User avatar
Hypex
Beta Tester
Beta Tester
Posts: 913
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2010 2:23 pm
Location: Vic. Australia.

Re: New kernels

Post by Hypex »

So have tested 6.17 RC3 on both Fienix and Zesty. Working fine as tested. There are the common i2c messages in logs but these look to be permanent now.
User avatar
xeno74
Posts: 10712
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2012 7:58 am
Contact:

Re: New kernels

Post by xeno74 »

Hypex wrote: Wed Aug 27, 2025 7:51 pm So have tested 6.17 RC3 on both Fienix and Zesty. Working fine as tested. There are the common i2c messages in logs but these look to be permanent now.
Thank you for testing.

Permanent? Do you also have these messages again and again after booting?
User avatar
Hypex
Beta Tester
Beta Tester
Posts: 913
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2010 2:23 pm
Location: Vic. Australia.

Re: New kernels

Post by Hypex »

xeno74 wrote: Thu Aug 28, 2025 5:12 am Permanent? Do you also have these messages again and again after booting?
No. Just during boot around the 4 second mark and one final "gasp for air" at the 19 second mark issuing a reset. By permanent I mean as part of the boot process with all these distracting lines about attempting to reset the bus.
User avatar
xeno74
Posts: 10712
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2012 7:58 am
Contact:

Re: New kernels

Post by xeno74 »

Hi All,

Here is the RC4 of kernel 6.17 for X1000 and e5500 machines (X5000/20, X5000/40, Mirari, and QEMU VMs).

Download and further information: github.com

Image

Please test the kernels.

Thanks,
Christian
User avatar
Hypex
Beta Tester
Beta Tester
Posts: 913
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2010 2:23 pm
Location: Vic. Australia.

Re: New kernels

Post by Hypex »

So tested the 6.17 RC4 on Zesty and Mint. Working fine as can I see. Typing this from Mint install.

One other thing I have noticed is this being common:

Code: Select all

[    0.316045] OF: /localbus@f0000000/cf@1000000: could not find phandle 14
[    0.316069] OF: /localbus@f0000000/cf@1000000: could not find phandle 1
[    0.316086] OF: /localbus@f0000000/cf@1000000: could not find phandle 10
[    0.316103] OF: /localbus@f0000000/cf@1000000: could not find phandle 11
Is this a reference to the CF card? I'm going by the "cf" so not sure. I don't have any CF card installed in my slot so wonder if the inability to find these handles is because I have no CF card installed.
User avatar
xeno74
Posts: 10712
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2012 7:58 am
Contact:

Re: New kernels

Post by xeno74 »

Hypex wrote: Tue Sep 02, 2025 8:40 pm So tested the 6.17 RC4 on Zesty and Mint. Working fine as can I see. Typing this from Mint install.

One other thing I have noticed is this being common:

Code: Select all

[    0.316045] OF: /localbus@f0000000/cf@1000000: could not find phandle 14
[    0.316069] OF: /localbus@f0000000/cf@1000000: could not find phandle 1
[    0.316086] OF: /localbus@f0000000/cf@1000000: could not find phandle 10
[    0.316103] OF: /localbus@f0000000/cf@1000000: could not find phandle 11
Is this a reference to the CF card? I'm going by the "cf" so not sure. I don't have any CF card installed in my slot so wonder if the inability to find these handles is because I have no CF card installed.
Hi Hypex,

Many thanks for testing the RC4.

I see the same OF localbus CF messages but my CF card works without any problems.

Cheers,
Christian
User avatar
Hypex
Beta Tester
Beta Tester
Posts: 913
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2010 2:23 pm
Location: Vic. Australia.

Re: New kernels

Post by Hypex »

xeno74 wrote: Wed Sep 03, 2025 6:59 am Hi Hypex,

Many thanks for testing the RC4.

I see the same OF localbus CF messages but my CF card works without any problems.

Cheers,
Christian
Ok, thanks. Must be normal then. Looks like it relates to a missing item pointer in the device tree. Which shouldn't be the case. But seems harmless otherwise. Since CD card driver works.
Post Reply