Arctic Fox

AmigaOne X5000 platform specific issues related to Linux only.
User avatar
xeno74
Posts: 10698
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2012 7:58 am
Contact:

Re: Arctic Fox

Post by xeno74 »

Roland wrote: Fri Jun 20, 2025 2:19 pm It does not start when trying to run it under MintPPC. Only Leafpad is opened, as if it were not an executable.
Which package do you use? There are two 32-bit PPC Linux packages. See above.
mintppc
Posts: 74
Joined: Thu May 01, 2025 9:20 am
Contact:

Re: Arctic Fox

Post by mintppc »

@Roland You better wait a bit, it will come to the repo soon.
@xeno74 Which one do you want me to package for MintPPC32 ?
User avatar
xeno74
Posts: 10698
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2012 7:58 am
Contact:

Re: Arctic Fox

Post by xeno74 »

mintppc wrote: Fri Jun 20, 2025 4:12 pm @xeno74 Which one do you want me to package for MintPPC32 ?
Please test both packages on MintPPC32. I am not sure if the Void package works on MintPPC32.
Roland
Posts: 873
Joined: Tue May 02, 2017 8:23 am

Re: Arctic Fox

Post by Roland »

xeno74 wrote: Fri Jun 20, 2025 2:33 pm
Which package do you use? There are two 32-bit PPC Linux packages. See above.
The one I refered in my message (https://github.com/rmottola/Arctic-Fox/ ... pc.tar.bz2).
- Roland -
User avatar
xeno74
Posts: 10698
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2012 7:58 am
Contact:

Re: Arctic Fox

Post by xeno74 »

Roland wrote: Fri Jun 20, 2025 9:31 pm
xeno74 wrote: Fri Jun 20, 2025 2:33 pm
Which package do you use? There are two 32-bit PPC Linux packages. See above.
The one I refered in my message (https://github.com/rmottola/Arctic-Fox/ ... pc.tar.bz2).
Ah, I see. Have you seen any error messages? Have you already tested the Void package?
mintppc
Posts: 74
Joined: Thu May 01, 2025 9:20 am
Contact:

Re: Arctic Fox

Post by mintppc »

I tried the rmottola version of AF 46.0. it works in MintPPC32. I looked at the build config and he used --enable-altivec. I think this version won't work on your machines.
mintppc
Posts: 74
Joined: Thu May 01, 2025 9:20 am
Contact:

Re: Arctic Fox

Post by mintppc »

I also tried the void version but it complains about a missing library:
libicui18n18n.so.71. I have various library versions there but not the 71 version...(72 and 76).
I installed the snapshot Debian libicu71 package https://snapshot.debian.org/archive/deb ... owerpc.deb
It then worked. It seems that this void version is quicker than the original rmottola version. Looking at this build config it seems that it should work on your type of machines as altivec has not been enabled. Please let me know if you want this void version packaged in MintPPC32.

Best regards,
Jeroen
User avatar
xeno74
Posts: 10698
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2012 7:58 am
Contact:

Re: Arctic Fox

Post by xeno74 »

mintppc wrote: Sat Jun 21, 2025 8:05 am I also tried the void version but it complains about a missing library:
libicui18n18n.so.71. I have various library versions there but not the 71 version...(72 and 76).
I installed the snapshot Debian libicu71 package https://snapshot.debian.org/archive/deb ... owerpc.deb
It then worked. It seems that this void version is quicker than the original rmottola version. Looking at this build config it seems that it should work on your type of machines as altivec has not been enabled. Please let me know if you want this void version packaged in MintPPC32.

Best regards,
Jeroen
Hi Jeroen,

Thanks a lot for testing.

Yes, it is better to create a deb package of the Void version for MintPPC32.

Have a nice weekend,

Christian
mintppc
Posts: 74
Joined: Thu May 01, 2025 9:20 am
Contact:

Re: Arctic Fox

Post by mintppc »

I uploaded AF 46.0.1 to the MintPPC32 repository. You can now safely upgrade.

Be aware that binaries stemming from xorg-server will be upgraded if you do an apt upgrade and that the /usr/lib/xorg/modules/libglamoregl.so will be reinstalled. This led to a non working X for me.
User avatar
xeno74
Posts: 10698
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2012 7:58 am
Contact:

Re: Arctic Fox

Post by xeno74 »

mintppc wrote: Sat Jun 21, 2025 11:00 am I uploaded AF 46.0.1 to the MintPPC32 repository.
Great! Thank you.
Post Reply