I think I didn't express well myself there.nbache wrote:Of course noone expects all users to refrain from customising their installed system, and ideally AmigaOS should function equally well on them all. But in practice, we beta testers cannot possibly cover testing with all the possible permutations of programs installed, settings changed and hardware connected etc. So when an update is nearing release, the focus is on testing it with a virgin setup, so that we have a common firm ground where we "know" things should work.Making tests on a fresh installation is useless not only because of the reasons already explained, but also because AmigaOS is a product that will end up in the hands of many (and lets hope lots of) people, and each and every one will have a system of his own, in one way or another: AmigaOS will have to be robust to perform as well as possible under the most disparate conditions - operating correctly when freshly installed is only the starting point.
I did not mean there should not be a common starting point (it can't be otherwise, of course), nor that betatesters should cover all the possibilities (which would be impossible even with an enormous number of betatesters).
I meant that since the actual systems of users differ from the default installation, the system has to be able to cope with variations. In this case, my system represents an "interesting" variation that could provide good information for the improvement of the OS: ignoring such system and making tests on a fresh installation would be an improductive move (I've said more about this in an earlier post, so I won't repeat the same stuff over and over again). Not to mention that, precisely because betatesters can't reproduce all the possible conditions, it wouldn't be even wise.
Sorry, but this does not make sense: if I install the OS from the scratch, the problem won't be there; moreover, there's not much to compare between a fresh installation made by me and a fresh installation made by somebody else.So the reason for asking for a test with a fresh installation is to compare with what we tested (and/or can test again) on our own systems.
(This has to be considered together with the next comment.)
On a fresh install MultiView will work because:Now there are two possibilities. One is that it works under the fresh installation, in which case we have to start installing and modifying step by step until we find the item which has some sort of problem with the update. The other is that it still doesn't work, and then we will have to look at things like hardware setup (maybe finding a beta tester who can duplicate that setup and - hopefully - reproduce the problem).
* it is known to work;
* it's unrealistic to think that there is a hardware-related problem that affects only the copy&paste functionality of MultiView.
That's why I'm making tests...Absolutely. But we need to be able to reproduce it on a beta tester's (or even better, the relevant developer's) system, and that requires isolating the relevant part of the setup which makes the problem appear or disappear.
As reported earlier, after booting without startup-sequence, MultiView doesn't work already: there's not much left to removeOf course this could theoretically also be done by removing stuff step by step from your system, until copy/paste works,

Now it's a matter of considering the components used by MultiView (especially relatively to the copy&paste functionality): a just kickstart-booted system should simplify the hunt.