Page 1 of 2
Bug in Prefs/WBStartup 53.25 (06.10.2014)
Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2015 7:25 pm
by ZeroG
There is a Bug in Prefs/WBStartup 53.25 (06.10.2015):
Select a item from the Startup modules list, lets say SYS:Utilities/SGrab for example.
Click the Information button.
RAWBInfo will pop up showing the wrong icon information.
Re: Bug in Prefs/WBStartup 53.25 (06.10.2014)
Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2015 8:18 pm
by MichaelMerkel
ZeroG wrote:There is a Bug in Prefs/WBStartup 53.25 (06.10.2015):
Select a item from the Startup modules list, lets say SYS:Utilities/SGrab for example.
Click the Information button.
RAWBInfo will pop up showing the wrong icon information.
there already is a brand new BZ entry for that.
so this classifies it now as an officially known bug
regards...
michael
Re: Bug in Prefs/WBStartup 53.25 (06.10.2014)
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2015 3:53 pm
by xenic
ZeroG wrote:There is a Bug in Prefs/WBStartup 53.25 (06.10.2015):
Select a item from the Startup modules list, lets say SYS:Utilities/SGrab for example.
Click the Information button.
RAWBInfo will pop up showing the wrong icon information.
Is it loading the wrong icon or loading the correct icon but showing the wrong information??
Re: Bug in Prefs/WBStartup 53.25 (06.10.2014)
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2015 4:12 pm
by tommysammy
ZeroG wrote:There is a Bug in Prefs/WBStartup 53.25 (06.10.2015):
Select a item from the Startup modules list, lets say SYS:Utilities/SGrab for example.
Click the Information button.
RAWBInfo will pop up showing the wrong icon information.
I have a fixed version here, you have to wait for an update
I don`t know when it appears
Re: Bug in Prefs/WBStartup 53.25 (06.10.2014)
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2015 4:19 pm
by ZeroG
@xenic
It seems to show the deficon for .info files (project type)...
@tommysammy

Re: Bug in Prefs/WBStartup 53.25 (06.10.2014)
Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2015 12:47 am
by samo79
Yep confirmed, same problem here

Re: Bug in Prefs/WBStartup 53.25 (06.10.2014)
Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2015 5:43 am
by Dragster
just to add another issue on wbstartup prefsprogram... it shows progress icons at boot, even those not selected to start...you can even add a number of apps to run, select none to start and it will show the progressof them all... not the expected behavior... (of course... all of that provided you select "show progress window in the wbstartup prefs itself...).
Cheers,
Dragster
Re: Bug in Prefs/WBStartup 53.25 (06.10.2014)
Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2015 12:30 pm
by MichaelMerkel
Dragster wrote:just to add another issue on wbstartup prefsprogram... it shows progress icons at boot, even those not selected to start...you can even add a number of apps to run, select none to start and it will show the progressof them all... not the expected behavior... (of course... all of that provided you select "show progress window in the wbstartup prefs itself...).
the not-selected icons are shown as "inactive" icons AFAIK.
so the behaiour is intended.
regards...
michael
Re: Bug in Prefs/WBStartup 53.25 (06.10.2014)
Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2015 11:37 pm
by Dragster
the not-selected icons are shown as "inactive" icons AFAIK.
so the behaiour is intended.
regards...
michael
How can you tell when the progress icons appear so fast? I haven't compared this behavior to OS 4.1u6, but I'm pretty sure it doesn't behave like that.. it only shows the icons of programs that actually get started...
I'll find out that tonight and will report back.
Thank you,
D.
Re: Bug in Prefs/WBStartup 53.25 (06.10.2014)
Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2015 12:25 am
by nbache
Dragster wrote:the not-selected icons are shown as "inactive" icons AFAIK.
so the behaiour is intended.
How can you tell when the progress icons appear so fast?
The deactivated icons are shown with a small red circle with a diagonal bar overlayed on them (looks a bit like a No parking sign).
I haven't compared this behavior to OS 4.1u6, but I'm pretty sure it doesn't behave like that.. it only shows the icons of programs that actually get started...
Not true, it has/had the same symbols overlayed.
I'll find out that tonight and will report back.
Okay, go ahead
Best regards,
Niels