Advice needed
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2019 6:00 pm
For a few days now I have noticed a lot of the following while booting and shutting down Ubuntu:Running dmesg brings up a hundred or so. I managed to kill a couple of hours not finding a clear solution with Google.
Wondering if it might be an Ubuntu thing, I booted fienix with the same results, but when I ran dmesg there I was told to run fsck because /dev/sdb1 and /dev/sdc1 were "not properly unmounted ..." Trying to run fsck in fienix got me a "no such command" reply, and an attempt to install it failed, so back to Ubuntu, where I had this result:
Not knowing what a dirty bit is (I use a lot of kernels with a dirty something or other) I was afraid to remove it, and "2" brought me a new option:
I chickened out again, and got a final option:
fsck /dev/sdc1 got sdb1's first and last options followed by a new one:
Another possibility that occurs to me is to let GParted try to fix those partitions. Neither is terribly important. /dev/sdb1 is mainly left over from earlier Ubuntu boots; I use /dev/sdc1 a lot to pass info among my systems. But then I am not sure that either of these device problems is related to the device descriptor read errors I am plagued with.
Advice?
Code: Select all
[ 289.426606] usb 2-1-port4: attempt power cycle
[ 290.928175] usb 2-1.4: new full-speed USB device number 125 using fsl-ehci
[ 291.004216] usb 2-1.4: device descriptor read/64, error -32
[ 291.183304] usb 2-1.4: device descriptor read/64, error -32
Wondering if it might be an Ubuntu thing, I booted fienix with the same results, but when I ran dmesg there I was told to run fsck because /dev/sdb1 and /dev/sdc1 were "not properly unmounted ..." Trying to run fsck in fienix got me a "no such command" reply, and an attempt to install it failed, so back to Ubuntu, where I had this result:
Code: Select all
bart@X5000:~$ sudo fsck /dev/sdb1
fsck from util-linux 2.27.1
fsck.fat 3.0.28 (2015-05-16)
0x41: Dirty bit is set. Fs was not properly unmounted and some data may be corrupt.
1) Remove dirty bit
2) No action
Code: Select all
There are differences between boot sector and its backup.
This is mostly harmless. Differences: (offset:original/backup)
65:01/00, 71:55/20, 72:42/20, 73:55/20, 74:4e/20, 75:54/20, 76:55/20
1) Copy original to backup
2) Copy backup to original
3) No action
Code: Select all
Reserved field in VFAT long filename slot is not 0 (but 0x61).
1: Fix.
2: Leave it.
Code: Select all
A new long file name starts within an old one.
It could be that the LFN start bit is wrong here
if "perian.ps" seems to match "".
1: Delete previous LFN
2: Leave it as it is.
3: Clear start bit and concatenate LFNs
Advice?