AmiSSL version 4
Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2017 3:52 pm
I notice that AmiSSL 4 has been released for OS4. Is it recommended that the AmiSSL installed by OS4 be replaced with the new version and has AmiSSL 4 been tested by the OS4 beta testers?
Support Forum
https://forum.hyperion-entertainment.com/
https://forum.hyperion-entertainment.com/viewtopic.php?t=3657
No, it's recomended that it be installed "as well as", not "instead of" I haven't had the chance to install it yet, so am not sure of the exact upgrade process.xenic wrote:I notice that AmiSSL 4 has been released for OS4. Is it recommended that the AmiSSL installed by OS4 be replaced with the new version
O.K. I guess I misunderstood the docs. I thought that it just had additional API and would work with old API. It seems like it would have been a good candidate for having 2 Interfaces (one for old API and one for new API). I looked at files in the archive and see an amisslmaster.library. I don't see how 2 libraries with the same name can be installed.broadblues wrote:No, it's recomended that it be installed "as well as", not "instead of" I haven't had the chance to install it yet, so am not sure of the exact upgrade process.xenic wrote:I notice that AmiSSL 4 has been released for OS4. Is it recommended that the AmiSSL installed by OS4 be replaced with the new version
Software needs to be recompiled to use amissl4 IIUC so you can't just install it and expect anything to automagically work with it. Changes in the underlying OpenSSL API etc etc
O.K. Your explanation was my interpretation of the docs but broadblues comments left me unsure. Have you tried any programs that use AmiSSL to see if it is in fact backward compatible? I know so little about SSL and secure connections that I'm being very cautious about installing v4 AmiSSL.nbache wrote:The way I understand it, the new version is specifically made to be installed on top of old versions and provide backwards compatibility for programs using those.
The new LIBS:amisslmaster.library should redirect to the old LIBS:AmiSSL/amissl_v097g.library for old programs and to the new LIBS:AmiSSL/amissl_v110d.library for those that have been recompiled.
I have installed it with the installer in the archive, and I have seen no ill effects so far (although I haven't been hunting for any explicitly yet).
Niels
I have accessed https:// pages, e.g. on PayPal (logged in, making a payment), with Odyssey without problems.xenic wrote:Have you tried any programs that use AmiSSL to see if it is in fact backward compatible?
But Odyssey didn't use AmiSSL, it uses directly openssl statically linked in. There wasn't any needs for Fab (and for me later when do porting) to use amissl, as pure compilation of openssl give the same result as well as don't rely on the slow amiga-specific development like waiting years for one or another library updateI have accessed https:// pages, e.g. on PayPal (logged in, making a payment), with Odyssey without problems.
The update may prove more important for OS3 than OS4. I still monitor the old IBrowse Yahoo ML and the latest post there indicates that new IBrowse will be compatable with MUI5 and use AmiSSL v4. It is still undetermined if IBrowse should work with MUI 3/4/5 or just MUI5.kas1e wrote: But Odyssey didn't use AmiSSL, it uses directly openssl statically linked in. There wasn't any needs for Fab (and for me later when do porting) to use amissl, as pure compilation of openssl give the same result as well as don't rely on the slow amiga-specific development like waiting years for one or another library update
It's also important for YAM users and certain ISPs (like german web.de) which started acting ill since last year refusing to work with AmiSSL3xenic wrote:The update may prove more important for OS3 than OS4. I still monitor the old IBrowse Yahoo ML and the latest post there indicates that new IBrowse will be compatable with MUI5 and use AmiSSL v4. It is still undetermined if IBrowse should work with MUI 3/4/5 or just MUI5.kas1e wrote: But Odyssey didn't use AmiSSL, it uses directly openssl statically linked in. There wasn't any needs for Fab (and for me later when do porting) to use amissl, as pure compilation of openssl give the same result as well as don't rely on the slow amiga-specific development like waiting years for one or another library update