Support Forum
https://forum.hyperion-entertainment.com/
https://forum.hyperion-entertainment.com/viewtopic.php?t=4446
Darrendaz wrote: Sat May 30, 2020 9:18 pm I use a 5 port hub now, and that doesn't cause problems. Do you have a different router you could try? Or can you connect through a Hub device first?
I have a Sagemcom modem with gigagabit ethernet ports, so the '100M' is not a valid explanation for this issue. Tested also with an A-Link WNAP router - no difference.daz wrote: Sat May 30, 2020 9:18 pm I used to have this when I first got my X5000. I'm told it's due to the ports your X5000 is connected to, apparently some 100Mbit ports don't fully comply and upset the DPAA. I use a 5 port hub now, and that doesn't cause problems. Do you have a different router you could try? Or can you connect through a Hub device first?
Many thanks for testing the final kernel 5.7!Skateman wrote: Wed Jun 03, 2020 8:47 am Final Kernel 5.7 up and running on the AmigaOne X5000
@All
Thanks so much for all the hard work!
Thanks a lot for testing!acefnq wrote: Wed Jun 03, 2020 12:15 pm Christian
Kernel 5.7 up and running. Many thanks for your ongoing dedication and hard work.
ace
Code: Select all
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
powerpc/64s: Fix KVM interrupt using wrong save area
to the 5.7-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
powerpc-64s-fix-kvm-interrupt-using-wrong-save-area.patch
and it can be found in the queue-5.7 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <[email protected]> know about it.
>From 0bdcfa182506526fbe4e088ff9ca86a31b81828d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nicholas Piggin <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 16:12:47 +1000
Subject: powerpc/64s: Fix KVM interrupt using wrong save area
From: Nicholas Piggin <[email protected]>
commit 0bdcfa182506526fbe4e088ff9ca86a31b81828d upstream.
The CTR register reload in the KVM interrupt path used the wrong save
area for SLB (and NMI) interrupts.
Fixes: 9600f261acaa ("powerpc/64s/exception: Move KVM test to common code")
Cc: [email protected] # v5.7+
Reported-by: Christian Zigotzky <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Christian Zigotzky <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64s.S | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64s.S
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64s.S
@@ -270,7 +270,7 @@ BEGIN_FTR_SECTION
END_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(CPU_FTR_CFAR)
.endif
- ld r10,PACA_EXGEN+EX_CTR(r13)
+ ld r10,IAREA+EX_CTR(r13)
mtctr r10
BEGIN_FTR_SECTION
ld r10,IAREA+EX_PPR(r13)
@@ -298,7 +298,7 @@ END_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(CPU_FTR_HAS_PPR)
.if IKVM_SKIP
89: mtocrf 0x80,r9
- ld r10,PACA_EXGEN+EX_CTR(r13)
+ ld r10,IAREA+EX_CTR(r13)
mtctr r10
ld r9,IAREA+EX_R9(r13)
ld r10,IAREA+EX_R10(r13)
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from [email protected] are
queue-5.7/powerpc-64s-kuap-add-missing-isync-to-kuap-restore-p.patch
queue-5.7/powerpc-64s-exceptions-machine-check-reconcile-irq-s.patch
queue-5.7/powerpc-64s-fix-kvm-interrupt-using-wrong-save-area.patch
queue-5.7/powerpc-book3s64-radix-tlb-determine-hugepage-flush-.patch
queue-5.7/powerpc-64s-exception-fix-machine-check-no-loss-idle.patch
queue-5.7/powerpc-pseries-ras-fix-fwnmi_valid-off-by-one.patch
Christian, did you already get and test a hub...? Did that solve the problem?
No, I haven’t test it with a hub yet.Roland wrote: Sat Jul 18, 2020 11:09 am Christian, did you already get and test a hub...? Did that solve the problem?