Re: x2d() bug
Posted: Mon Oct 18, 2021 9:06 pm
The signed/unsigned thing was in relation to the TRL-2 definition, i.e. Rexx, not necessarily ARexx.
I don't know enough about it to judge whether there is indeed a bug here, but I suspect it's more of a limitation rooted in the age of our implementation (32/64 bit etc.).
But if someone knows more, I'm eager to hear it.
Best regards,
Niels
I don't know enough about it to judge whether there is indeed a bug here, but I suspect it's more of a limitation rooted in the age of our implementation (32/64 bit etc.).
But if someone knows more, I'm eager to hear it.
Best regards,
Niels