Thanks a lot for testing!
Strange, lspci is available on my Fienix.
Code: Select all
/usr/bin/lspci
Wolfram asked Sven if he can maintain the P. A. Semi CPU in the future.
Sven answered:Wolfram wrote: > F: arch/arm64/boot/dts/apple/
> +F: drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pasemi-platform.c
We have no dedicated maintainer for PASEMI. Are maybe you or your
project interested in maintaining the pasemi-core, too? I guess not many
patches will show up and they will likely be for M1 anyhow.
If so, then no need to resend, I could add the extra line while
applying.
Shall we add a "Tested-by" tag for you?Sven wrote: On Sat, Oct 9, 2021, at 12:09, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>> F: arch/arm64/boot/dts/apple/
>> +F: drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pasemi-platform.c
>
> We have no dedicated maintainer for PASEMI. Are maybe you or your
> project interested in maintaining the pasemi-core, too? I guess not many
> patches will show up and they will likely be for M1 anyhow.
>
> If so, then no need to resend, I could add the extra line while
> applying.
Sure, feel free to add the core to the entry as well.
Best,
Sven
FYI:
Link: [PATCH v2 00/11] Add Apple M1 support to PASemi i2c driverOn Sat, Oct 9, 2021, at 15:57, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
> On 09 October 2021 at 12:10 pm, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>>> I still don't have access to any old PASemi hardware but the changes from
>>> v1 are pretty small and I expect them to still work. Would still be nice
>>> if someone with access to such hardware could give this a quick test.
>> Looks good to me. I will wait a few more days so that people can report
>> their tests. But it will be in the next merge window.
>>
> Series v2:
>
> Tested-by: Christian Zigotzky <chzigotzky@xenosoft.de> [1]
thanks a lot, glad to hear everything works on P.A Semi CPUs as well!
And regarding that git am issue you wrote about: I think I based this series on
torvald's tree instead of 5.15-rc4 and there have been some changes to at least
MAINTAINERS. It'll probably apply cleanly to 5.15-rc5 but if that happens again
in the future you can try
git am -3 mbox
instead. It'll try to do a three way merge if the patch doesn't apply cleanly.
Sven